Question
In this question, three statements are given, followed
by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: All cars are trains. All trains are scooters. Some scooters are cycles. Conclusions: I. All cycles are cars. II. Some cycles are trains.Solution
All cars are trains (A) + All trains are scooters (A) → All cars are scooters (A) + Some scooters are cycles (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. All trains are scooters (A) + Some scooters are cycles(I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
As per Section 304(1), theft becomes snatching when:
Section 50 of the BNSS, 2023 empowers the arresting officer to—
Which section empowers the CVC to exercise superintendence over the CBI in corruption cases?
Under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, a person who is or has been a director of a company shall not be eligible to be re-appointed as a direc...
Consider the following statements regarding proof of admissions under Section 19-20 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023:
Statement 1: An adm...
Under Section 42 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, what is the penalty imposed on a scheduled bank for shortfall in maintaining the Cash Reserve R...
Which of the following is true?
What is the limit of number of select group of persons who can be identified by the Board for offer of securities or invitation to subscribe securities ...
A is accused of burning down his house in order to obtain money for which it is insured. The facts that A lived in several house successively each of wh...
Provisions of condition and warranty are in which section of Sales of Goods Act, 1930?
Relevant for Exams:
