Question
In this question, three statements are given, followed
by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: All cars are trains. All trains are scooters. Some scooters are cycles. Conclusions: I. All cycles are cars. II. Some cycles are trains.Solution
All cars are trains (A) + All trains are scooters (A) → All cars are scooters (A) + Some scooters are cycles (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. All trains are scooters (A) + Some scooters are cycles(I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
She says the exhibition is not just an attempt to showcasing a ways of life but also their survival instinct.
The local fishermen have obligated to the Jetpur-Porbandar pipeline on the ground that the effluents would degrade the sea and kill fishes and marine ec...
This is a classic and simple story that never fail to be funny and interesting.
Of the four given options, choose the most appropriate one.
If you want to be more than just ordinary, then at some point, you're going to have to learn to burn your boots .
In consonance in the goal of provide health for all under the National Health Policy, care should be universal, and free at the point of delivery...
It's a tempting offer, but I'm afraid I'm going to have to place a rain check on that one.
Neither the professor nor the students (has been) notified about the schedule change.
She took the square tins and cut out some square (cakes) for the little boys.
During the COVID-19 lockdown, international travel remained in-large curtailÂ
Relevant for Exams:
