Question
Statements: 8% rays are satellites. All
satellites are planets. A few stars are satellites. Conclusions: I. All stars being planets is a possibility. II. No star is a ray. In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
A few stars are satellites (I) + All satellites are planets (A) β Some stars are planets (I) β Probable conclusion β All stars may be planets (A). Hence conclusion I does not follow. 8% rays are satellites (I) + All satellites are planets (A) β Some rays are planets (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
What is the primary purpose of a `SEQUENCE` in SQL?
In PL/SQL, what type of parameter allows a procedure to both receive a value from the calling environment and return a modified value back to it?
Which SQL clause is used for filtering rows?
Which SQL command is used to modify existing records in a table?
Which type of trigger fires once for each row affected by the triggering DML statement?
Which operator is used for pattern matching in SQL?
When does an implicit cursor get automatically declared and managed by PL/SQL?
Which SQL command is used to remove a table completely?
Which join returns rows from the left table even when there is no matching row in the right table, filling with NULLs for the right side?
What is an SQL `VIEW`?