Question
Statements: All actors are producers. Some
producers are not directors. Conclusions: I. Some directors are actors. II. All producers are actors. In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give Answer:Solution
All actors are producers (A) + Some producers are not directors (O) = No conclusion. Hence, conclusion I will not follow. All actors are producers (A) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some producers are actors (I). Hence, conclusion II will also not follow.
If the suit was not instituted in proper court_________________
What does the term "Air Pollutant" refer to in the context of the Air Prevention and Control of Pollution Act 1981?
Appeal shall lie only if case involves a substantial question of law in case of :
Burden to prove the plea of alibi is on theÂ
Which of the following is an exception to S.132?
What is meant by coercion as defined under section 15 of the Contract Act?
Which of the following is a valid defense under BNSS that completely absolves a person from criminal liability?
To refresh his memory a witness may refer to a document ______?
The doctrine of res-judicata is incorporated under which section of CPC?
Section 6 of the limitation Act is related to: