Question
In the questions given below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Plates are Spoons. All Saucers are Cups. No Saucers are Plates. Conclusion: I. Some Cups are not Plates. II. All Spoons can be Cups. III. Some Saucers are not Spoons.Solution
All Saucers are Cups (A) → Conversion → Some Cups are Saucers (I) + No Saucers are Plates (E) → Some Cups are not Plates (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Cups are not Plates (O) + All Plates are Spoons (A) → Probable conclusion → All Spoons can be Cups (A). Hence conclusion II follows. No Saucers are Plates (E) + All Plates are Spoons (A) → Some Spoons are not Saucers (O*). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which of the following individuals is excluded from the definition of "employee" for the purpose of filing a Voluntary Information Disclosure Form under...
Which of the following is considered as a rule of Fair Hearing under Administrative Law?
As per Section 16(3)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Board shall, ________ of the receipt of a reference from the Adjudicating Autho...
Consider the following statements regarding the attachment and confiscation of property under Sections 5 and 8 of the PMLA, 2002:
Statement 1: ...
As per Section 21 of the Factories Act, 1948, every factory should fence which of the following machineries?
Section 221 provides that for offences under Section 67 BNSS where the parties are married—
Which of the following Union Territory has Local legislature as per Art. 239 A of the Constitution?
The definition of fact is given in which section of the Act?
SSC in the legal field stands for?
Which of the following is not an essential element that a plaintiff must prove in an action for negligence?