Question
In the questions given below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Plates are Spoons. All Saucers are Cups. No Saucers are Plates. Conclusion: I. Some Cups are not Plates. II. All Spoons can be Cups. III. Some Saucers are not Spoons.Solution
All Saucers are Cups (A) β Conversion β Some Cups are Saucers (I) + No Saucers are Plates (E) β Some Cups are not Plates (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Cups are not Plates (O) + All Plates are Spoons (A) β Probable conclusion β All Spoons can be Cups (A). Hence conclusion II follows. No Saucers are Plates (E) + All Plates are Spoons (A) β Some Spoons are not Saucers (O*). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
What are the responsibilities of the bailor regarding faults in the goods bailed as per the Contract Act?
What is the definition of "gender" according to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Limitation to file suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief act 1963, is:
In which Islamic legal school is the giving of a dowry (mahr) to the bride considered a mandatory requirement in marriage?Β
When did the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021, receive Parliamentary assent, replacing the corresponding Ordinance?
Presumption as to electronic agreements is discussed under section β¦.of Indian Evidence Act?
When there are several defendants, service of summons shall be made _____________.
If a person makes non-natural use of his land by collecting there something which is likely to do mischief by escape, he will be liable if the thing so ...
Which of the following Articles of the Constitution provides for Finance Commission?
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is applicable to :