In the question below some statements are given followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some Dogs are Rats.
No Dog is Cat.
All Cats are Tigers.
Conclusions:
I. Some Rats are not Tigers.
II. Some Cats are Dogs.
III. Some Cats are not Rats.
No Dog is Cat (E) + All Cats are Tigers (A) → Some Tigers are not Dogs (O*) + Some Dogs are Rats (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. No Dog is Cat (E) → Conversion → Some Cats are not Dogs (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Some Dogs are Rats (I) → Conversion → Some Rats are Dogs (I) + No Dog is Cat (E) → Some Rats are not Cat (O). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which is not a measure of central tendency?
The innermost layer of the human gut wall is:
Given below are two statements: One is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R):
Assertion (A): Tetrazolium test imparts...
Which one the following is Sesame plant response to day length?
Black soil is use for the cultivation of
Molya disease of wheat is caused by ________:
The Command Area Development & Water Management (CADWM) Program was started as a Centrally Sponsored Scheme in the year 1974-75 with the objective to br...
The von Bertalanffy equation is frequently used in fisheries biology and fisheries management to estimate
Malling IX is a rootstock of:
Supply chain mapping is the study of ...................................?
