Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Dogs are Rats. No Dog is Cat. All Cats are Tigers. Conclusions: I. Some Rats are not Tigers. II. Some Cats are Dogs. III. Some Cats are not Rats.Solution
No Dog is Cat (E) + All Cats are Tigers (A) → Some Tigers are not Dogs (O*) + Some Dogs are Rats (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. No Dog is Cat (E) → Conversion → Some Cats are not Dogs (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Some Dogs are Rats (I) → Conversion → Some Rats are Dogs (I) + No Dog is Cat (E) → Some Rats are not Cat (O). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
What is the position of P with respect to her sister?
Who among the following are immediate neighbours of H?
Who sits between A and D?
Who among the following sits fourth to the right of P?
How many persons sitting between I and H?
How is O related to K?
Whose income is the second highest?
If all the persons are made to sit in alphabetical order in a clockwise direction with respect to A, then how many persons remain unchanged in their po...
Who among the following is an immediate neighbor of B?
How many girls are sitting between the one who uses Acer laptop and Geet in anticlockwise direction from the one who uses Acer laptop ?
Relevant for Exams:
