Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Dogs are Rats. No Dog is Cat. All Cats are Tigers. Conclusions: I. Some Rats are not Tigers. II. Some Cats are Dogs. III. Some Cats are not Rats.Solution
No Dog is Cat (E) + All Cats are Tigers (A) → Some Tigers are not Dogs (O*) + Some Dogs are Rats (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. No Dog is Cat (E) → Conversion → Some Cats are not Dogs (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Some Dogs are Rats (I) → Conversion → Some Rats are Dogs (I) + No Dog is Cat (E) → Some Rats are not Cat (O). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Under Cr.P.C if a women sentenced to death is found to be pregnant her death sentence may be commuted to imprisonment for life by the :
Which of the following statement is correct about Evidence Act ?
Which of the following is a tort of trespass to person?
Substitution of old contract with new one______?
The National Financial Reporting Authority shall consist of a chairperson, who shall be a person of eminence and having expertise in accountancy, auditi...
A enters into a partnership with B and C to undertake a contract of construction of a building and divide the profits equally among them. This is
In, “Neither accusation is true”, the word. “neither” is a: =
As per the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 the authorised capital of the General Insurance Corporation shall be rupees __________
The endorsement made on the document admitted in evidence shall be signed or initialed by
Who constitutes the national Legal Services Authority as per the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987?
Relevant for Exams:
