Question
In each question below are given three statements
followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â All mammals are reptiles. All snakes are reptiles. All reptiles are amphibians. Conclusions:Â Â Â Â Â Â I. All mammals are amphibians. II. All snakes are amphibians. III. Some amphibians are mammals.Solution
All mammals are reptiles. (A) + All reptiles are amphibians(A) = All mammals are amphibians(A). Hence, conclusion I will follow. All snakes are reptiles (A) + All reptiles are amphibians(A) = All snakes are amphibians. Hence, conclusion II will also follow. All mammals are amphibians(A) ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some amphibians are mammal (I). Hence, conclusion III will also follow.
With reference to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, upon application of the decree holder the court which passed the decree may, whenever think fit iss...
During a night raid, a burglar enters a residential house with the intention of committing theft. Upon confrontation with the homeowner, he causes griev...
Which of the statements are correct relating to the nature of shares or debentures of a company?
In the context of insurance, which tort principle holds a person liable for damages caused by their failure to exercise reasonable care leading to loss ...
“Environmental pollutant” is defined under which section of the Act?Â
Which of the following categories of persons is NOT entitled to free legal services under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987?Â
As laid down under the Companies Act the instrument creating a charge shall be preserved for a period of _____________ from the date of satisfaction of...
How many digits are there in the Importer Exporter Code?
Which section of Patents Act, 1970 deals with burden of proof in case of suits concerning infringement?
Under the Contract Act where one party promises to perform an act that they knew, or could have known with reasonable diligence, to be impossible or unl...
Relevant for Exams:
