Question
Statement: All badmintons are rackets.
Some rackets are rubbers. No rubber is a string. Conclusion: I. Some strings are not rackets. II. Some rubbers may not be rackets. III. No badminton is rubber. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some rackets are rubbers(I) + No rubber is a string(E) → Some rackets are not strings(O). Hence, conclusion I will not follow. Some rackets are rubbers(I) → conversion → Some rubbers are rackets(I) → Probable conclusion → Some rubbers may not be rackets(O). Hence, conclusion II will follow. A + I = no conclusion. Hence, conclusion III will not follow.
The constitutional Validity of Section 499- the Indian Penal Code (Defamation) has been upheld by the Supreme Court of India in which of the following c...
Where any asset reconstruction company or any person fails to comply with any direction issued by the Reserve Bank under this Act the adjudicating auth...
SSC in the legal field stands for?
As per section 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita the consent of the victim is immaterial in determination of the offence of trafficking. The statement ...
In 2023 who was appointed as the new Chief Justice of India?
Under Section 9(2)(f), what power does the Board have in relation to the letter of approval granted to a Developer?
Which one among the following does not fall into the category of expert evidence
Consider the following statements regarding grievous hurt under Sections 116-119 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:
Statement 1: Grievous h...
Which school of jurisprudence emphasizes that law is a command of the sovereign backed by threats of sanctions?
An agreement not enforceable by law is stated to be void underÂ