Question
Statement: All cups are bowls. All bowls
are trays. Some trays are plates. Conclusion: I. Some trays are cups. II. Some bowls are plates. III. No bowl is a plate. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
All cups are bowls(A) + All bowls are trays(A) → All cups are trays(A) → conversion → Some trays are cups(I). Hence, conclusion I will follow. A + I → No conclusion. Hence, neither conclusion II nor III will follow but they will make a complementary pair. Hence, either conclusion II or III will follow.
A pawnee can exercise the right of retainer ___________
Specific relief can be granted for enforcing__________________
In case of an offence punishable with fine only, imprisonment for non-payment of fine:
Which kind of property can be transferred as per the TP Act, 1882?
How many appeals are provided under CPC?
What is meant by a Court of Record?
Law of Limitation is based on the maxim-
As per S. 125 of the Indian Evidence act, 1872 a police officer____________.
The Board of every company referred to in section 135 (1), shall ensure that the company spends, in every financial year, at least two per cent of the a...
Which one of the following is not correct, related to offence of theft?
Relevant for Exams:
