Question
Statement: All cups are bowls. All bowls
are trays. Some trays are plates. Conclusion: I. Some trays are cups. II. Some bowls are plates. III. No bowl is a plate. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
All cups are bowls(A) + All bowls are trays(A) → All cups are trays(A) → conversion → Some trays are cups(I). Hence, conclusion I will follow. A + I → No conclusion. Hence, neither conclusion II nor III will follow but they will make a complementary pair. Hence, either conclusion II or III will follow.
What was held in the case of Hansia vs Bhaktawramal?
Who shall appoint employees of SAT?
Which chapter of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 deals with Leases of Immovable Property?
According to the Information Technology Act, 2000, which entity is responsible for constituting the Cyber Regulations Advisory Committee?
The case of Hochester V. De La Tour deals with
Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is ______________
Indian Evidence Act does not expressly mention about:
As per the Transfer of Property Act what is a lease of immoveable property, and what are the terms used for the parties involved?
Which Islamic legal school requires the presence of two witnesses for a marriage contract to be considered valid?Â
What is the composition of the Taluk Legal Services Committee  under the Legal Services Authority Act?