Question
Statements:All circles are rectangles. No
rectangle is a square. Conclusions:I. No square is a rectangle. II. Some rectangles are circles. III. Some circles are squares. In each of the questions below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No rectangle is a square (E) ⇒ conversion ⇒ No square is a rectangle (E). Hence, conclusion I will follow. All circles are rectangles (A) ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some rectangles are circles (I). Hence, conclusion II will also follow. A + E = E and I type conclusion cannot be drawn from E type proposition. Hence, conclusion III will not follow.
What does TACCP stands for?
Cognizable Offence means
False imprisonment is a tort that occurs when________________ as per Tort Law
 According to the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 on and from the appointed day, no court or other authority shall have, or be entitled to ...
Which of the following is not a basic feature of “Command theory given by Austin?
Under the Contract Act the promise in a contract of indemnity, acting within the scope of his authority, is entitled to recover from the promisor_______...
Joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament is chaired by:Â
When is the object or consideration of an agreement unlawful?
The transaction will not be hit by doctrine of lis pendens if the suit is pending in the court:
Where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is__________________