Question
Statements: Some dogs are cats. No camel is a
rat. All cats are camels. Conclusions: I. All dogs may be camels. II. Some dogs may not be camels. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read both the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answerSolution
For conclusion I, second statement is not required, because we find a common term ‘cat’ in the first and the third statement. Some dogs are cats (I) + All cats are camels (A) = Some dogs are camels (I) ⇒ Probable conclusions ⇒ All dogs may be camels (A) and Some dogs may not be camels(O). Hence, both conclusion I and II will follow.
What is the goal of the recruitment process?
What is the role of courage in decision-making?
In the context of public services, what does "professional competence" emphasize?
What leadership style involves making decisions without consulting others?
In the context of civil service, what does impartiality for civil servants entail?
What is the key role of values in ethical conduct?
What is a critical aspect of project risk assessment during appraisal?
What does the term "due diligence" refer to in the context of business ethics?
Why is maintaining privacy important in interpersonal relationships?
What is a primary consideration in supplier selection during the procurement process?