Question
Statements: Some dogs are cats. No camel is a
rat. All cats are camels. Conclusions: I. All dogs may be camels. II. Some dogs may not be camels. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read both the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answerSolution
For conclusion I, second statement is not required, because we find a common term ‘cat’ in the first and the third statement. Some dogs are cats (I) + All cats are camels (A) = Some dogs are camels (I) ⇒ Probable conclusions ⇒ All dogs may be camels (A) and Some dogs may not be camels(O). Hence, both conclusion I and II will follow.
What was the AMRUT scheme previously called?
Which of the following is NOT a pillar of Mission Karmayogi?
Match the following international footballers with their national teams:
Which country introduced the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) service to boost financial inclusion in October 2024?
In IT sector what does IoT stands for -
Who has the authority to decide in the event of dispute in election of the President of India?
All noble gases are ?
Which of the following European country is the guarantor of Bank of Central African States ?
The Uranium deposits are mostly found in which of the following mines of India?
Which company has contributed over 33% (Most UPI transactions) of overall UPI transactions?