Question
Statements: All jugs are mugs. Some mugs are
glasses. All glasses are bowls. Conclusions: I. Atleast some bowl are glasses. II. No glass is a jug. In each of the questions below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I, and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
All glasses are bowls (A) ⇒Conversion ⇒ Some bowl are glasses. Hence, conclusion I follows. All jugs are mugs (A) + Some mugs are glasses(I)⇒No conclusion. Hence, conclusion II will not follow.
Court need not frame charges in which case?
The Industrial dispute Act fourth schedule lays down provisions relating to ___________
Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under ……. Of age
As per the Court Fees Act which of the following documents are chargeable with any fee?
Negligence as a tort was developed in the case of?
Which Section of SEBI Act, 1992 deals with Management of Board for SEBI?
Which of the following acts constitutes an offence under the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955?
Marshalling is ___.
Under CrPC, if it is found out that wrong court has decided the suit, what will happen to the order passed by the court?
The offence of dishonor of the cheque excludes