Question
Statements: No painting is a frame. All frames
are lights. Some lights are canvas. Conclusions: I. No light is a painting. II. Some lights are paintings. In each of the questions below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I, and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No painting is a frame(E) + All frames are lights(A) ⇒ Some lights are not paintings.(O). Hence neither conclusion I nor II follows but they will form a complementary pair. Hence either conclusion I or III follows.
In which case the difference between invitation to offer and offer has been laid down___________________
Art.13 is not applicable to?
The specific performance of a contract may not be obtained by:
In a bailable offence, bail is granted as a matter of right
In the case of Parag Engineering Works vs Union of India and Ors. the Court discussed the meaning and application of ________________-
Who are not competent to Contract as per the Contract Act?
What is the minimum and maximum number of directors required in a public company as per the Companies Act, 2013?
In the context of the establishment of Permanent Lok Adalats under the Legal Services Authorities Act, what is the role of the Central Authority or Stat...
As per the Employee’s Compensation Act, what shall be the amount of compensation where death results from the injury
What are Eligible Companies under section 76 of the Companies Act, 2013?