Question
Statements:Some students are Rich. Â Â Â Â
 No Rich is a teacher. Conclusions:I. Some teacher are not Rich.   II. Some Rich are students. III. No teacher is a Rich. In each of the questions below are given two statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No Rich is a teacher (E) ⇒ conversion ⇒ No teacher is Rich (I) ⇒ I.I ⇒ Some teacher are not Rich (O). Hence, conclusion I and conclusion III will follow. Some students are Rich (I) ⇒ conversion ⇒ some Rich are students. Hence, conclusion II will also follow.
What happens to laws in force before the commencement of the Constitution of India if they are inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution?
Which of the following is not a valid defense in an action for tort?
Precept is issued to________.
What does GMP stands for?
Who is authorized to compound an offence punishable with fine only, and what is the maximum sum that can be collected for compounding under the LLP Act?
In which case, while fastening the liability on the accused, the Court stated that – “They also serve who only stand and wait”?
Provision for participation of workers in management of industries has been incorporated into the Constitution of India under which Article?
Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, which section provides legal recognition to electronic records?
The famous case of Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Datt is related to:
Provision of Sections 143 & 147 for speedy trial of offences relating to bouncing of Cheques were inserted by: