Question
Statements: All frocks are skirts. No pant is a
frock. Some dresses are pants. Conclusions: I. Some skirts are not frocks. II. At least some skirts are not pants. III. At least some frocks are dresses. In each question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
All frocks are skirts (A) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some skirts are frocks(I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. No pant is a frock(E) + All frocks are skirts(A) ⇒ Some skirts are not pants(O*). Hence conclusion II follows. Some dresses are pants(I) + No pant is a frock(E) ⇒ Some dresses are not frocks(O). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
As per Section 7(2) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, if a proposal prescribes a specific manner in which acceptance must be made, and the acceptance is...
As per SC(R ) Act, contracts in derivative shall be legal and valid if such contracts are
Which of the following statements regarding a pawnee is correct?
Under Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which of the following best describes the essence of a proposal in contract law?Â
How can ratification occur in a contract of agency?
What is the entitlement of an agent in the absence of any contract to the contrary?
Under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, the minimum period of notice for the acquisition of land is
Which statement accurately reflects the definition and legal effect of a "contract of indemnity" under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?Â
Which of the following is not a valid reason for the termination of an agency?
A general lien as per section 171 of the Contract Act can be exercised by whom?