Question
Statement :Â No cup is a saucer. Â Â Â Â
       Some saucer are cubes.           All plates are cubes. Conclusion :        I. Some cubes are not cups.. II. At least some saucers are cups. III. No saucer is a plate. In each question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.ÂSolution
No cup is a saucer (E) + Some saucer are cubes (I) ⇒ Some cubes are not cups.(O*) . Hence conclusion I follows. No cup is a saucer (E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ No saucer is a cup(E). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Some saucer are cubes (I) + Some cubes are plates (I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which part of RDBMS handles concurrency control to ensure multiple transactions operate concurrently without conflicts?
What is the main purpose of the parity bit in error detection?
A 'ransomware' attack typically involves:
Wi-Fi networks (IEEE 802.11) primarily use which medium access control method to avoid collisions?
What does a "hash" represent in the context of blockchain?
What is the scope of a parameter in a function?
The "fetch-decode-execute" cycle in CPU control design refers to the sequence of actions performed for each:
- Name the method in which each user is assigned with an equal-portion of the bandwidth.
What is a key advantage of the Go programming language in terms of concurrency?
Accessing top element of stack without deleting it ?