Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in nowStatement 1 is supported. The passage says households where women were the borrowers saw more significant improvements in child welfare, so targeting women can positively impact children. Statement 2 is also supported. The conclusion drawn in the passage is that empowering women financially leads to better outcomes for children — this implies that women’s financial role influences decisions regarding children's welfare. Statement 3 is too extreme. The passage says households experienced improvements, not that all of them did, and especially not always. The word "always" makes this inference invalid.
?3 - 25 × 11 = 30 - 15 × 12
45% of 360 - 160 + ? = √324
3 √(432 – 13 + 9 × 32) = ?
(150% of 950) ÷ ? = 25
290 × 15 ÷ 5 + 34 + 50 = ?
18 + 28÷ 4 - 14 = ? - 35
...