Question
Even a limited strike by the U.S. to diminish North
Korea’s missile capabilities, as advised by some strategists in Washington, could instantly turn into a full-scale war if North Korea’s volatile leader, sees it as a threat to his regime. I. In order to showcase their respective strengths, U.S and North Korea are eager for a war. II. Threats to regime of one country by another country mostly turn into full scale wars. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answer :Solution
If US and North Korea were eager for a war, it would have already taken place. None is eager. US wants to diminish North Korea’s missile capabilities. Thus, I is not implicit. Threats turning into wars depend on veracity and magnitude of the threat and full scale wars are mostly avoided. Thus, II is not implicit.
Which of the following functions has a degree of homogeneity not equal to unity?
The price elasticity of demand for good X is known to be twice that of good Y. Price of X falls by 5% while that of good Y rises by 5%. What is the perc...
According to the Mundell-Fleming model for a small open economy with flexible exchange rates, if the Federal Reserve cannot alter domestic int...
The graph that shows the relationship between the size of a tax and the tax revenue collected by the government is known as a
Money Multiplier is always
What is the Slope of the Straight line PPC curve between cloth and wheat?
Vaccination dose by some individuals benefits the individuals around them by reducing the pace with which the disease spreads. This is an example of whi...
Which school of economic thought suggested that one possible cause of inflation was a ‘push’ from the cost side?
 In the case of cost-push inflation, other things being equal:
CBDC concern for monetary policy transmission:
