Question
Even a limited strike by the U.S. to diminish North
Korea’s missile capabilities, as advised by some strategists in Washington, could instantly turn into a full-scale war if North Korea’s volatile leader, sees it as a threat to his regime. I. In order to showcase their respective strengths, U.S and North Korea are eager for a war. II. Threats to regime of one country by another country mostly turn into full scale wars. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answer :Solution
If US and North Korea were eager for a war, it would have already taken place. None is eager. US wants to diminish North Korea’s missile capabilities. Thus, I is not implicit. Threats turning into wars depend on veracity and magnitude of the threat and full scale wars are mostly avoided. Thus, II is not implicit.
The production planning department prepares a list of materials and stores required for the completion of a specific job order, this list is known as:
A leader must match the leadership style according to the readiness of subordinates. This is true as per which of the following theory?
What is the total backstop facility provided by the Corporate Debt Market Development Fund (CDMDF)?
Which institutions are considered National Development Banks (NDBs) under the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) framework?
Which of the following is the utility of Equity Multiplier for the investor?
What is the difference between partial and full capital account convertibility?
Which of the following is NOT a duty of a trustee under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882? Â
Which of the following is not a mode for making remittances to SEBI Investor Protection and Education Fund Bank A/c?
A company can improve (lower) its debt-to-total assets ratio by doing which of the following
Which statement answers the question “Why a company exists?”