Question
The Securities Appellate Tribunal has rightly ordered
the lifting of the trading restrictions imposed on the companies that approached it. I. Some companies were imposed with trading restrictions. II. If any company does not approach the Securities Appellate Tribunal, it will be imposed with trading restrictions. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answer :Solution
Clearly, from the statement some companies were imposed with trading restrictions which were lifted after those companies approached the Securities Appellate Tribunal. Thus, I is implicit. Not every company needs to approach the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The companies which felt that justice was not being to them with the imposition of the restriction went to the tribunal. The companies which were not restricted earlier need not visit the tribunal. Thus, II is not implicit.
Where in India is the headquarters of Citibank India located?
Khandvi' is a delicacy of which state of India?
What event does Mongolia observe on October 25 as part of its efforts to protect the Mongolian Wild Ass?
Where is the Headquarters of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
Winner of the La Liga’s top scorer and the best the player awards for the 2016-17 is____________
The Headquarters of the World’s largest association of Football, International Federation of Football Association (FIFA) is in
When is the International Day of Action For Rivers observed?Â
Cooperative Credit Societies Act was enacted in the year?
Ramman, a religious festival characterized by its unique rituals and performances, is observed in which Indian state?
Consider the following statements in regards to 38th Amendment Act, 1975:
1. This Act amended Articles 123, 213 and 352 of the Constitution
<...