Question
The Securities Appellate Tribunal has rightly ordered
the lifting of the trading restrictions imposed on the companies that approached it. I. Some companies were imposed with trading restrictions. II. If any company does not approach the Securities Appellate Tribunal, it will be imposed with trading restrictions. In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement. Give answer :Solution
Clearly, from the statement some companies were imposed with trading restrictions which were lifted after those companies approached the Securities Appellate Tribunal. Thus, I is implicit. Not every company needs to approach the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The companies which felt that justice was not being to them with the imposition of the restriction went to the tribunal. The companies which were not restricted earlier need not visit the tribunal. Thus, II is not implicit.
Who among the following is the author of “Prithvirajaraso”?
What is the chemical formula of table salt?Â
- Which planet was the first to be discovered through mathematical predictions rather than direct observation?
Which of the following pairs is incorrectly matched?
Who had won the Tata Steel Chess India Blitz title for the year 2024?
In April 2025, which brand appointed Ananya Panday as its Indian ambassador?
Who among Indian cricket players achieved an impressive milestone by reaching 4,000 runs in just 116 innings in men's T20 cricket, making it the fastest...
- What happens when Napalm comes into contact with surfaces like human skin?
Which IIT and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd have collaborated to establish the Kotak School of Sustainability?
Which are the top export markets for India’s textiles and apparel?