Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
We have, U sits opposite to the one who sits second to the left of O. Only two persons sit between K and O. K sits to the left of O. From the above condition, there are three possibilities.
Again we have, The number of persons sit to the left of U is the same as the number of persons sits to the right of Y. W sits second to the right of Y. J sits immediate left of M, none of them sits at end of the row.
Again we have, L sits opposite to the one who sits second to the left of Z. X and Y are not immediate neighbours. From the above condition, case2 and case3 get eliminated. Case1 shows the final arrangement.
As per the Transfer of Property Act where the terms of a transfer of property direct that the income arising from the property shall be accumulated eith...
According to Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 1908, the court shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of wh...
Plaint is covered under which order of CPC?
If a partner earns some profit for himself from the business of the firm?
There is a school by the side of the road. Three children of nursery class stray away from the school on to the road. A truck driver, who was driving th...
According to section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, if any person is disposed without his consent of immovable property otherwise then in due cour...
As laid down under the Banking Regulation Act no banking company shall have in its Board of directors, ______________directors who are directors of comp...
For the purposes of Section 141 of Negotiable instruments Act. 1881. 'Company' doesn't mean:
What is the punishment for false evidence under Companies Act 2013 ?
In the law of evidence, a retracted confession