Question
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully.
Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All gabions are walls. All concretes are walls. All bridges are walls. Conclusions: (I) Some bridges are gabions. (II) Some concretes are bridges.ÂSolution
All gabions are walls (A) + [All bridges are walls (A) → conversion] → Some walls are bridges (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. All concretes are walls (A) + + [All bridges are walls (A) → conversion] → Some walls are bridges (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
“Any person liable, by any Indian law to be tried for an offence committed beyond India shall be dealt with according to the provisions of this Code ...
As discussed under General defences in IPC, which of the following is not recognized as a valid consent under any section IPC?
Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) held that:Â
Which of the following is a necessary or are necessary ingredients to constitute accident as a defence under the IPC?
Which of the following offences is not covered by the general defence mentioned under S. 94 that is act compelled by threats of IPC?
Which of the following is not subjected to causing of death of person in private defence?
Article 22(1) states: “No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arres...
The power of the Supreme Court to issue writs for enforcement of Fundamental Rights is under which Article?Â
Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) held that:Â
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) is associated with:Â
Relevant for Exams:
