In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. You have to take given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all
the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
No Tulip is Rose
No Rose is Orchid
Only a few Orchids are Jasmines
Conclusions:
I. No Tulip is Orchid
II. Some Tulips are Jasmines
The correct answer is C
A re-examination of a case for lack of jurisdiction made by a higher court is?
All agreements are not contract if it is________________
A suit is duly instituted if filed as per ____ of CPC:
Under section 12 of the Competition Act, 2002 what is the period of restriction on employment of Chairperson and other Members?
The following rule as to consideration is true:
The President can proclaim emergency on the written advice of the
The presiding officer in an arbitral tribunal of 3 arbitrators shall be appointed by ?
Right to information is a :
The expression "District Judge" includes:
R K Malkani v. State of Maharashtra is related to which of the following :
