Question
Seven persons namely – Reena, Heena, Gautam, Ziyana,
Hari, Rohit and Jyoti are sitting in a row not necessary in same order in such a way that some are facing north while others are facing south. Reena sits third to left of Hari, either of them sits at end of the row and Rohit sits immediate left of Reena. Rohit sits second to left of Ziyana, who is facing south. How many person sits facing south? I. Person sitting immediate neighbor of Ziyana sits fourth to right of Jyoti. Person sitting at end of the row sits facing in opposite direction and Gautam sits third from right end. Hari faces north direction. II. Person sitting immediate left of Rohit sits fourth to right of Jyoti and Gautam sits second to left of Hari. Each of the questions below consists of a question and two statements numbered I and II given below it. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question:Solution
We have: Â Reena sits third to left of Hari, either of them sits at end of the row, which means we get two possibilities, in case (1) Hari sits facing north at right end and in case (2) Reena sits at extreme left end. Â Rohit sits immediate left of Reena and Rohit sits second to left of Ziyana, who sits facing south, that means case (2) is not valid, in case (1a) Reena sits facing south and in case (1b) Reena sits facing north. Based on above given information we get: From I: We have: Person sitting immediate neighbor of Ziyana sits fourth to right of Jyoti, which means Jyoti must sits facing south. Â Person sitting at end of the row sits facing in opposite direction, which means person at left end sits facing south. Gautam sits third from right end, which means case (1a) is not valid. Based on above given information, we have following result:
Case1a Gautam sits third from right end, this condition is not satisfied so rejected. Since, direction facing of Heena, Rohit and Gautam is not known, thus we can’t determine required result. Hence, statement I is not sufficient. From II: We have:  Person sitting immediate left of Rohit sits fourth to right of Jyoti, which means in case (1a) Rohit sits facing south and in case (1b) Rohit sits facing north. Gautam sits second to left of Hari, which means case (1a) is not valid. Based on above given information, we get following result: Case-1b
Since, direction of Heena and Gautam is not known, thus result can’t be determined. Hence, statement I and II together are not sufficient.
It is what Buddhists and various (A)/other doctrines aim to severe (B)/in an effort to transcend (C)/samsaric rebirth and needless suffering (D).
After the ache in the neck from grazing upwards at these alluring frescoes, we sat down for a while, rubbing our necks, in the splendid dance hall with ...
"This question consists of a sentence which is divided into four parts numbered (1) to 4. only one part of the sentence is not acceptable in standard w...
That summer, elections were (a) / held at many a place (b) / without any untoward incident. (c) / No error (d)Â
1. Plankton is our planet’s most prolific life form, and the food it generates makes up the base layer of the global food chain.
2. The variety...
(A) Men are anxious to improve/ (B) their circumstances, but are /(C) unwilling to improve themselves; / (D) they so remain bound / (E) no error.
The updated protocol provided for (A)/home isolation at the fully vaccinated asymptomatic persons (B)/and another categories and took (C)/ the vaccinat...
Below are given some sentences (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5). All the sentences represent the same idea expressed in different ways. You have to choose the...
If sunlight will not come for days together, it will cause lot of health problems.
While there may be a limited number of options and variety (A)/there are certainly enough quality destination to keep satisfy (B)/the appetite of those...