Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The (I) course of action cannot be taken as terminating the employee without properly investigating the complete matter should not be done. The employee should not be terminated until the allegations on the employee X are found to be true. No, (II) Employee Y should be strictly penalised for doing so, as it is mentioned that Employee Y is trying to defame Employee X, but Employee Y cannot be strictly penalised instead can be given a warning and if done same in the future than can be penalised. So, Neither (I) nor (II) follow.
What is meant by coercion as defined under section 15 of the Contract Act?
The burden of proof as to any particular fact lies on that person
Which of the following is not an advisory function of Central Advisory Committee?
What is the composition of Finance Commission of India?
Who among the following is the propounder of the “pigeon- hole” theory?
Which of the following best describes the scope of administrative law?
As per the Companies Act, what are the conditions for which should be fulfilled for right issue?
The concept of Ombudsman first originated in: