Question
Statement: Â Employee Y of a company is trying to
defame the image of employee X of the same company by making false allegations about him to his manager so that Employee X cannot get his pending promotion. Employee X has reported this event to the senior manager. Courses of action: I. The manager should terminate employee X with immediate effect. II. Employee Y should be strictly penalised for doing so. Each question below has a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and based on the information given in the statement, decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s).Solution
The (I) course of action cannot be taken as terminating the employee without properly investigating the complete matter should not be done. The employee should not be terminated until the allegations on the employee X are found to be true. No, (II) Employee Y should be strictly penalised for doing so, as it is mentioned that Employee Y is trying to defame Employee X, but Employee Y cannot be strictly penalised instead can be given a warning and if done same in the future than can be penalised. So, Neither (I) nor (II) follow.
Training and Visit system; a extension approach also called
Which of the following is a major traceability system implemented by APEDA for grapes?
The TBT Agreement primarily deals with which of the following?
Which body ensures traceability of spice exports through its “SpiceNet” initiative?
What is the main economic advantage of organic farming for smallholders?
The TBT agreement promotes which of the following principles?
The concept of “Minimum Export Price” (MEP) is primarily used to:
Which of the following is the apex body responsible for the promotion of agricultural exports in India?
India’s agri export policy aims to double agricultural exports by which year?
Which scheme is launched by APEDA to promote export of agri-products from clusters identified across India?