Question
In this question, three statements are given, followed
by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements. Statements: All teachers are doctors. All doctors are lawyers. Some lawyers are policeman. Conclusions: I. All policeman are teachers. II. Some policeman are doctors.Solution
All teachers are doctors (A) + All doctors are lawyers (A) → All teachers are lawyers (A) + Some lawyers are policeman (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. All doctors are lawyers (A) + Some lawyers are policeman (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Who formed the association in favour of widow remarriage in Madras Presidency?
The famous “Charminar” a historic monument located in _______built by Sultan Mohammed Quli Qutb Shah in 1591.
At Palais des Nations in Geneva, how many countries signed GATT on 30 October 1947?
In how many broad belts are the minerals in India generally concentrated?
The King of which state of Rajasthan division was the first to sign the Letter of Accession to India?
Sultan Abu Bakr Shah was from which of the following dynasties?
In which one of the following cities, Sawai Jai Singh II did not built an observatory?
The Kiwi fruit/doesn't tastes very good/but it seems that / it is quite nutritious.
Which one of the following vallies is located between Shivalik and Middle Himalayas?
Consider the following statement:
(1) India buys Eighth position in terms of nominal Gross Domestic product among the world economy
(...