Question
Read the following statements thoroughly: 1.
Habitual offender clause was removed in 2018. 2. Misappropriation remains criminal misconduct. 3. Criminal misconduct now includes illicit enrichment. Which statements are correct according to the PC Act?Solution
The 2018 amendment brought key changes to the PC Act: 1. The habitual offender clause was removed, reducing mandatory enhanced punishment for repeat offenders. 2. Misappropriation remains criminal misconduct under Section 13, recognising breach of public trust. 3. Criminal misconduct now includes illicit enrichment, making disproportionate assets relative to lawful income punishable. All three statements are accurate, reflecting the evolution of the law to address modern forms of corruption, maintain accountability for misuse of office, and include wealth accumulation without legitimate source. Options (a), (c), (d), and (e) are incorrect because they omit at least one element. Therefore, (b) is correct, showing the PC Actβs broad scope post-2018 amendments.
How many sections are there in BNS?Β
Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) held that:Β
Which of the following is a necessary or are necessary ingredients to constitute accident as a defence under the IPC?
Article 22(1) states: βNo person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arres...
Article 20(1) states: βNo person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act.β...
Within the respective spheres, the union and the state legislature are made supreme, and they should not encroach on the sphere reserved for other. This...
Which part of the Constitution contains provisions related to Panchayats?
If right to private defence is subjected to risk of harm to innocent person_______________?
Which Article of the Constitution empowers the State Legislature to endow Panchayats with necessary powers and authority to prepare plans for economic d...
Which section of IPC deals with when the right to private defence of body can extend to causing death?