Question
The landmark case with respect to the relevancy of
privity of contract in torts isÂSolution
• The landmark case that deals with the relevancy of privity of contract in tort law is Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932). • This case established the modern principle of negligence and introduced the "neighbour principle", which holds that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer, even without a direct contractual relationship (privity of contract). • The House of Lords held that the defendant owed a duty to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions likely to injure a "neighbour," defined as persons closely and directly affected by one's actions. • This case marked a shift away from the strict doctrine of privity by recognizing tort liability independent of contractual relationships.
According to Union Budget 2023-24, consider the following statements regarding Income Tax:
1. Average processing period reduced from 93 days i...
Which of the following process best describes that the future value of an amount is much more than the sum of the principal and the annual rate of inte...
As per Ind AS 16 / AS 10, the residual value of a tangible fixed asset should be:
How much worth of credit guarantees were approved under the Credit Guarantee Scheme (CGS) in the financial year 2024–25 alone?
In which of the following leadership style, a leaders is considered genuine and honest and cares for the employees’ opinion?
Which of the following is a digital lending platform initiated by the Government of India to facilitate MSME loans?
What are two methods by which Credit Risk can be measured by?
What is the minimum investment required for an investor to participate in an Angel Fund under Category I AIF?
Which of the following statements is incorrect about the Indian economy as the Indian Budget 2023-24?Â
According to Union Budget 2023-24, consider the following statements regarding MSMEs:
1. Medium enterprises with turnover up to Rs 2 crore and ce...