Question
The landmark case with respect to the relevancy of
privity of contract in torts isÂSolution
• The landmark case that deals with the relevancy of privity of contract in tort law is Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932). • This case established the modern principle of negligence and introduced the "neighbour principle", which holds that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer, even without a direct contractual relationship (privity of contract). • The House of Lords held that the defendant owed a duty to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions likely to injure a "neighbour," defined as persons closely and directly affected by one's actions. • This case marked a shift away from the strict doctrine of privity by recognizing tort liability independent of contractual relationships.
An entrepreneur is setting up his new business. He purchases some equipment. He also takes insurance on the equipment for which the premium is paid for...
Who appoints the auditor for a government company, and what is the time frame for this appointment?
Which ratios are a measure of the speed with which various accounts are converted into sales or cash?
Which of the following is not a type of securities market in India?
Under the RBI’s guidelines for import of gold by Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) holders, how many days of advance payment are allowed for Qualified Jewellers...
Which of the following describes the relationship between systematic risk and return?
Match the following inflation types with their correct descriptions:
1. Stagflation
2. Core Inflation
3. Reflation
A. When t...
If an individual is unable to pay back the overdraft taken by him, which of the following risk is the bank facing?
Pradhan Mantri Vaya Vandana Yojana (PMVVY) is one of the major Schemes of Government of India to protect the interest of the Senior citizens. What is t...
Which of the following statements accurately describes the concept of "crowding out" in the context of fiscal policy?