Question
The landmark case with respect to the relevancy of
privity of contract in torts isÂSolution
• The landmark case that deals with the relevancy of privity of contract in tort law is Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932). • This case established the modern principle of negligence and introduced the "neighbour principle", which holds that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer, even without a direct contractual relationship (privity of contract). • The House of Lords held that the defendant owed a duty to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions likely to injure a "neighbour," defined as persons closely and directly affected by one's actions. • This case marked a shift away from the strict doctrine of privity by recognizing tort liability independent of contractual relationships.
Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under ……. Of age
No company limited by shares shall, after the commencement of the Companies Act, 2013 issue any preference shares which are __________________
The title of Section 6 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 is:
As per Section 8A(1)(b), one of the actions the Commission may take is:
What does the writ of Certiorari mean?
According to Section 6 of the BNSS, 2023, which of the following is not a class of Criminal Court in every State?
A cyber criminal used an intermediate server located outside India to access and modify data in an Indian government agency's computer system. The modi...
According to the Code on Social Security, 2020 Employees’ State Insurance Corporation shall consist of ___________________
Section 8 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 prohibits a banking company from doing which of the following?
Facts, not otherwise relevant, are relevant if they________________ opinions of experts, when such opinions are relevant.