📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • âś–

      Question

      The landmark case with respect to the relevancy of

      privity of contract in torts is 
      A Ashby v. White Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B Donoghue v. Stevenson Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C Ryland v. Fletcher Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E Lumley v. Gye Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      • The landmark case that deals with the relevancy of privity of contract in tort law is Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932). • This case established the modern principle of negligence and introduced the "neighbour principle", which holds that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer, even without a direct contractual relationship (privity of contract). • The House of Lords held that the defendant owed a duty to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions likely to injure a "neighbour," defined as persons closely and directly affected by one's actions. • This case marked a shift away from the strict doctrine of privity by recognizing tort liability independent of contractual relationships.

      Practice Next
      More Other Laws and Acts Questions
      ask-question