Question
The landmark case with respect to the relevancy of
privity of contract in torts isÂSolution
• The landmark case that deals with the relevancy of privity of contract in tort law is Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932). • This case established the modern principle of negligence and introduced the "neighbour principle", which holds that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer, even without a direct contractual relationship (privity of contract). • The House of Lords held that the defendant owed a duty to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions likely to injure a "neighbour," defined as persons closely and directly affected by one's actions. • This case marked a shift away from the strict doctrine of privity by recognizing tort liability independent of contractual relationships.
If the last day of the limitation period falls on a public holiday, what happens to the limitation period as per Section 27?Â
Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which of the following is an example of a "descriptive" mark that is generally not registrable as a trademark?
Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event does not happen can be enforced__________________
What is the rule regarding the use of identification modes under section 11A of the PMLA?
Under Limitation Act, suit for possession on the basis of prior possession may be filed within
Under Section 16(2) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, directors/managers are also guilty if offence committed with their:
The obligation under s.126 of the Indian Evidence Act________.
Under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which of the following would NOT qualify as an unfair trade practice?Â
Under Section 45 and Section 51 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, an easement is extinguished upon the complete destruction of either the dominant or s...
Shareholder director means a director who represents the interest of shareholders, and elected or nominated by such shareholders_________________ as per...
