Question
Which of the following correctly explains the
constitutional consequences when a local law (a Panchayat Act) conflicts with a State law on a subject in the State List?Solution
Panchayats derive their powers from State legislation enacted under Part IX. Therefore, in case of inconsistency between Panchayat regulations and State law on a State List subject, State law prevails. However, States cannot arbitrarily undermine Panchayats in a manner that defeats the constitutional purpose of decentralization. In State of U.P. v. Pradhan Sangh Kshettra Samiti (1995), the Supreme Court recognized Panchayats as institutions of self-government but clarified that they function within the constitutional framework of State control. Judicial review remains available to prevent abuse.
Statements:
Some cakes are bread.
All breads are biscuits.
Some biscuits are toffees.
No toffee is ...
In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if t...
Statements:
No cube is a cuboid.
Some cuboids are cones.
All cones are quadrilateral.
Conclusion:
I. No cone is a...
Statements:
coins - mines.
cakes - mines.
hats - coins.
mines + ropes.
Conclusions:
I. ropes + hats
II....
Statements :Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Some fathers are mother.
                               All mothers are son.
...In the following questions below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be t...
Statements: Some doors are rods.
               Some rods are curtains.
            ...
Statements:
No waiter is a bar.
Some bars are bottles.
All bottles are drinks.
Some drinks are motels.
Conclusions:
In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if ...
Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at varia...