šŸ“¢ Too many exams? Donā€™t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert šŸ‘‰ call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • āœ–

      Question

      In the case of Rupchand vsĀ  Raghuwanshi 1964, the

      Supreme Court has held that:
      A ex parte decree can be set aside. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B ex parte decree is not a decree in the true sense as per s. 2(2) of CPC. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C ex parte decree is a decree under s.2 (2). Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D Restoration of original suit is an adverse effect of ex parte decree. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      In this case the Supreme Court held that the effect of setting aside an ex parte decree is that the suit is restored and the court should proceed to decide the suit as it stood before the decree. The ex parte is a decree under s.2(2) of the Code and therefore, an aggrieved party can also file an appeal under section 96(2) of the Code.

      Practice Next
      More Other Laws and Acts Questions

      Relevant for Exams:

      ask-question