Question
In the case of Rupchand vs Raghuwanshi 1964, the
Supreme Court has held that:Solution
In this case the Supreme Court held that the effect of setting aside an ex parte decree is that the suit is restored and the court should proceed to decide the suit as it stood before the decree. The ex parte is a decree under s.2(2) of the Code and therefore, an aggrieved party can also file an appeal under section 96(2) of the Code.
Which of the following statement regarding Chapter-VIII of The Transfer of Property Act. 1882 relating to 'Of transfers of actionable claims', is incorr...
Ramesh instigates a child Pappu to commit murder and the murder is committed in consequence. Who is liable?
The PPV&FR Act, 2001 uniquely protects both plant breeders and farmers. What is the concept of "Farmers' Privilege" under the Act, and how does it diffe...
Under Section 203 of the BNS, 2023, Q, a municipal corporation officer responsible for property disposal, is legally bound by his service regulations no...
Nothing is an offence which is done by a child under ……. Of age
Which of the following is NOT a function of the Controller of Certifying Authorities according to the IT Act, 2000?
With reference to the Indian Contract Act, 1872. promises which form the consideration or part of the consideration for each other are called______.
What is the Provision for absconding to avoid service of summons or other proceedings under the Contempt of The Lawful Authority of Public Servants of T...
A is accused of murder of B by pistol alleged to by purchased on 10 August at Lucknow. A makes statement that on 10 August he was at Bhopal not at Luckn...
How can a person accused of insider trading defend themselves as per the provisions of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015?
Relevant for Exams:
