Question

In the case of Rupchand vs Raghuwanshi 1964, the

Q: Answer-In the case of Rupchand vs Raghuwanshi 1964, the Supreme Court has held that:

In this case the Supreme Court held that the effect of setting aside an ex parte decree is that the suit is restored and the court should proceed to decide the suit as it stood before the decree. The ex parte is a decree under s.22 of the Code and therefore, an aggrieved party can also file an appeal under section 962 of the Code.

Supreme Court has held that:

A ex parte decree can be set aside.

B ex parte decree is not a decree in the true sense as per s. 2(2) of CPC.

C ex parte decree is a decree under s.2 (2).

D Restoration of original suit is an adverse effect of ex parte decree.

Practice Next

Relevant for Exams:

SJVN Executive Trainee

In the case of Rupchand vs Raghuwanshi 1964, the

Solution

Relevant for Exams: