Login / Signup

Question

In the case of Rupchand vs Raghuwanshi 1964, the Supreme Court has held that:

A ex parte decree can be set aside.

B ex parte decree is not a decree in the true sense as per s. 2(2) of CPC.

C ex parte decree is a decree under s.2 (2).

D Restoration of original suit is an adverse effect of ex parte decree.

Practice Next

More Other Laws and Acts Questions

Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, where a person lawfully does anything for another person, not intending to do so gratuitously, and such other person e...
If a Money Bill' is passed by Lok Sabha and transmitted to Rajya Sabha and the Rajya Sabha do not return the Money Bill within______it will be deemed to ha...
The Eighth Schedule of the Constitution lists recognized languages. Which of the following is a constitutional consequence of a language being included in ...
In which of the following secondary evidence relating to a document cannot be given______
The Central Advisory Committee under Food Safety and Standards Act is appointed by
As per the definition of Prospectus under the Companies Act a prospectus means and includes___________
Special Courts established under section 435 of the Companies Act shall consists of ______________ who shall be appointed by the Central Government with th...
Section 11(3)(c) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 requires the sample container to be:
Under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, during pendency of conciliation/adjudication proceedings, employers cannot:
A member of an All- India service and civil service of any States holds office __________.

Relevant for Exams:

SJVN Executive Trainee

Hey! Ask a query

ask-question