Question
A company's employee used company data to log into client accounts without authorization and altered their account settings. The company suffered data breach reputation damage. Under the IT Act, which statements are correct? Statement 1: The employee's action violates Section 66 (unauthorized access). Statement 2: The company can claim civil remedy under Section 43 for damages. Statement 3: The company's failure to implement Section 43A data protection standards is a separate offense. Statement 4: The employee can claim exemption because they were authorized to access the company's systems. Which statements are correct?
More Other Laws and Acts Questions
- Section 125 protects whom from disclosing information obtained during professional duties?
- Who is considered the father of Analytical Jurisprudence, emphasizing law as a system of rules separated from morality?
- Within how many days is a Public Information Officer (PIO) required to respond to an RTI application under the RTI Act, 2005?
- Under Section 31 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, when goods are sold "as is" or "as they stand":
- The inherent powers of the court under Section 151 of CPC can be exercised:
- Under Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, Bank Z imposes the following charges on customers: (i) ₹10 per NEFT transaction; (ii) ₹1...
- Section 22 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 renders a confession irrelevant in criminal proceedings if it is made under certain circumstances. Whic...
- Remedial liability under the concept of Jurisprudence is based on the principle of:
- Property of a partnership firm
- In the case of Rupchand vs Raghuwanshi 1964, the Supreme Court has held that:
Relevant for Exams:
Hey! Ask a query
Please enter email id
The email must be a valid email address.
Please enter Mobile Number
Please enter valid Mobile Number
Please enter your Doubt
