Question
In the case of Puttuswamy vs UOI, right to privacy was
interpreted to be a Fundamental right guaranteed under Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. How many judges were there in the bench?Solution
There was a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India nation passed a historic judgment affirming the constitutional right to privacy. A retired High Court Judge Puttaswamy against the Union of India (the Government of India) before a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court which had been found out on reference from the Constitution Bench to work out whether or not the right to privacy was secure as associate degree freelance elementary right following conflicting selections from alternative Supreme Court benches .
Statement : All times are distances.
All distances are trains.
All trains are averages.
No average is speed.
Conclusion:<...
Statements:
All nice are tampered.
All tampered are beaten.
All mixed are beaten.
Conclusions:
I. No tampered is mixe...
Some diaries are not pencils. All notebooks are papers. Some diaries are not notebooks
Statements:Some combs are boxes.
All boxes are mirrors.
Conclusions:I. Some boxes are combs.
II. Some mirrors are combs.
Statement : Only pant is T-shirt
Some pant is Shirt
No shirt is jacket.
Conclusion
I. All T-shirt being Shirt is a possib...
Statements:
Only a few Bottle is Cold
All Cold are Weather
Some Water are Weather
Conclusions:
I. All Bottle be...
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be tr...
Statement:
Only a few Guava are Mango.
All Mango are Avocado.
Conclusion:
I. Some Guava are Avocado is...
Statements:
Only a few Adidas are Nike
All Nike are Puma
No Nike is a Reebok
Conclusions:
I. All Puma being Nike...
Statement:
Some Maths are Physics
Few Physics are not Chemistry
Only English is Chemistry
Conclusion:
I. Some C...