New Enroll here to Join NaBFID Analyst Into Class on May 6

    Question

    Among the following cases the Supreme Court has held

    that the investigating officer should be allowed to refer to the records of investigation?
    A State of Rajasthan v. Ani Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B State of Karnataka v. Yarappa Reddi Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C State of Punjab v. Gurmeet Singh Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Raghunandan v. State of U.P. Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    In State of Rajasthan v. Ani : AIR 1997 SC 1023, the Supreme Court clarified that "reticence may be good in many circumstances, but a Judge remaining mute during trial is not an ideal situation State of Punjab v. Gurmeet Singh,It is a judgment that deals with rape. Raghunandan vs state of UP, It is true that the ban, imposed by section 162 Criminal Procedure Code, against the use of a statement of a Witness recorded by the Police during investigation, appears sweeping and wide.

    Practice Next