Question
Landmark case of Wright v. Tantham is related
to:Solution
Wright v. Tantham laid guidelines about the admissibility of evidences. It is a famous Exchequer Court decision on the use of hearsay within a trial
Monthly savings of X is 66% of his monthly income which is Rs. 8000. If ratio of monthly expenditure of Y and X is 15:8 respectively and monthly savings...
Ajay spent 30% of his monthly income on rent and 44% of the remaining on food and the rest amount is saved by him which is Rs. 2548, then find the month...
In a city, the number of persons travelling by bike is 65% the number of persons travelling by metro. The number of persons travelling on foot is 80% th...
Out of the total income of Priya, she spends 25% on food, 30% on rent and 25% on groceries. Out of the remaining income, she donates 10% in a charity an...
Meenu spent 30% of the salary on entertainment and 10% on makeup. She spent 10% of the remaining on the food and 50% of the remaining invested in mutual...
- A farmer harvested 8000 kg of produce, where 40% of the produce was fruits and the remaining was vegetables. If 60% of the fruits harvested and 50% of the ...
- If 40% of 'x' is the same as 20% of '120', then determine 'x'.
Two students appeared in an exam and one secured 12 marks more than the other. If marks of student who got more marks is 55% of the sum of the marks of ...
A shopkeeper marks an item 50% above its cost price. During a sale, he provides two successive discounts of 20% and 10%. Calculate the profit percentage.
- Initially, Rina’s salary was Rs. 40,000 and the ratio of her expenditure to her savings was 3:5. After a salary increase, she reduced her expenditure by ...
