Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The case of Pickard v. Sears is related to estoppel, wherein a person by his words or conducts induces to another person to believe a fact and subsequently acts according to that belief or to alter his previous position, the accused is barred from later changing his position
In the question below, there are three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true ...
Statements:
Only plates are cups.
Some plates are saucer.
No saucer is spoon.
Conclusion:
I. No spoon is cup.
...
Statements-:
Only a few Apple are not Mango
Some mangoes are orange
All orange are grapes
Conclusions-:
I. All ...
Statements:Some pastries are cakes.
No cake is a pudding.
All puddings are sweets.
Conclusions:I. Some sweets are not cakes.
Conclusions:
I. Some Apples are being Bananas is a possibility
II. At least Some Papayas are being Bananas is a p...
Statements:
All oranges is apples.
Some apples is pears.
Only a few pears is watermelon.
Conclusions:
I. Some pears c...
Statement:
Only Cricket is Kabaddi.
Some Cricket is Football.
Conclusion:
I. All Cricket a...
Statements:
Some animal are mammal.
Some mammal are herbivore.
No herbivore is carnivore.
Conclusions:
I. Some animal...
Statements:
Only White are Grey
No Blue are Black
All Blue are White
Conclusion:
I. Some Blue can be Grey
<...Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at varianc...
