Question
In the case of Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab the
Court held that_______________Solution
It was observed by the Supreme Court that death penalty is Constitutionally valid and it does not constitute unreasonable, cruel and unusual punishment. Death penalty is to be imposed only for special reasons and the rarest of the rare cases. Hence, such provisions cannot be said to be violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
Under the RTI Act, a person who is not satisfied with the information provided or the handling of the request may approach which forum after exhausting ...
Which of the following statements are true related to the Chairperson under the PFRDA Act?
A company engaged in the manufacture of goods accepts deposits of money from the public merely for the purpose of financing its business as a manufactur...
What is the time period within which a suit filed under the provisions of the Specific Relief Act shall be disposed of by the court?
In order to apply the doctrine of Res-Judicata, which of the following is “former suit”?
A civil court cannot issue commission in the following case
Under the PMLA, the records of transactions maintained by reporting entities must be preserved for a period of how many years after the transaction?
Session trials are?
Section 28(3)(vi) deals with the situation where a person objects to the Recovery Officer's notice to pay third-party dues. What happens if that objecti...
Under Chapter IIIF of the RBI Act, 1934, who determines the inflation target and how frequently under Section 45ZA?
Relevant for Exams:
