Question
The Supreme Court has recently delivered a judgment
expounding the doctrine of "lis pendens in case of –Solution
In the recent case of Girish Vs. Subba Raju 2022 the Supreme Court has delivered a judgment expounding the doctrine of "lis pendens”. The bench of Justice KM Joseph and PS Narasimha stated that the transfer of the property during pendency of the suit is not void or invalid. However, such transfer will be subject to the final outcome of the suit. Moreover, The Court also held that neither the seller can set up plea of final disposition of the property nor the purchaser can take a defence of being a bona fide purchaser/lack of notice against the doctrine of lis pendens.
Statements: A > I = L ≥ Y = T ≥ W, D < V ≤ W
Conclusions:
I. Y ≥ D
II. V ≤ L
III. I > D
...Statement: P = O ≥ N ≥ Y < M < W ≥ X; Y > Z
Conclusion:
I. Z ≥ X
II. P > Z
...Statements: C ≥ E > M ≤ Z < B; G ≥ Z > K
Conclusions: I. C > K II. G ≥ B �...
Statements:Q = S > T > Z; T > Y = H < I
Conclusions: I. Z > H II. I > Z
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is/are definitely true and the...
Statements:
A ≥ T > I, D > I, U = P ≥ I
Conclusions:
I. U > D
II. A > I
Statement: C ≥ D > E < F ≥ G; D ≥ H = J
Conclusion:
I. C > H
II. C = J
Statements: X@W, W#U, U$Q, Q@R
Conclusions :
I. Q % W
II. U ...
In the following question the relationship between different elements is given in the statements followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the stateme...
Statement: N < M; G ≤ V = M; J > V; K ≥ M
Conclusion:
I. J > K
II. K ≥ J
Relevant for Exams:
