Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
It was observed by the Court that the “goods on a display are an invitation, not an offer” and thus, the Court held that display of goods along with price tags merely amounts to invitation to treat and therefore, if an intending buyer is willing to purchase the goods at a price mentioned on the tag, he makes an offer to buy the goods. Thus, the shopkeeper has the right to accept or reject the same. The contract would arise only when the offer is accepted. Powell v. Lee- an acceptance is treated as valid; it is necessary that the same must be communicated to the offeror either by the offeree or by some duly authorized person on his behalf. Harvey v. Facey - Mere reply of a query is not an acceptance. Felthouse v. Bindley- acceptance should be communicated and such communication should be made to the offeror.
Under which section of the IPC, Gang rape is punishable?
Interim measures can be ordered by Court as per which section of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
Which of the following foilowing section of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 is related with the expulsion of a partner ?
Which of the following legal systems is based on judicial precedent?
According to the Transfer of Property Act, when can a Court issue a precept to another Court for the attachment of the judgment-debtor's property?
Which of the following is true about a Minor's liability in a partnership firm?
What is the term of office for the President of India?
Who is the Judge in case of Ashby Vs. White?
Under which products order specifications for vanaspati, margarine and shortenings are laid down?
In the case of a private company, ________________, shall be the quorum for a meeting of the company