It was observed by the Court that the “goods on a display are an invitation, not an offer” and thus, the Court held that display of goods along with price tags merely amounts to invitation to treat and therefore, if an intending buyer is willing to purchase the goods at a price mentioned on the tag, he makes an offer to buy the goods. Thus, the shopkeeper has the right to accept or reject the same. The contract would arise only when the offer is accepted. Powell v. Lee- an acceptance is treated as valid; it is necessary that the same must be communicated to the offeror either by the offeree or by some duly authorized person on his behalf. Harvey v. Facey - Mere reply of a query is not an acceptance. Felthouse v. Bindley- acceptance should be communicated and such communication should be made to the offeror.
Z is carried off by a tiger. A fires at the tiger knowing it to be likely that the shot may kill Z, but not intending to kill Z, and in good faith inten...
Which of the following offences is not covered by the general defence mentioned under S. 94 that is act compelled by threats of IPC?
A bailiff acting under an order of the Court does that act without the knowledge that the Court has no jurisdiction to do so____________
Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of right of private defence is mentioned under which section of the Indian Penal Code?
A, a surgeon, in good faith, communicates to a patient his opinion that he cannot live. The patient dies in consequence of the shock. He had knowledge o...
If Sheela commits an assault followed by attempt to murder of Neha in a bar after consuming intoxicating substances, what will be the charge on her? Or...
doli incapax is:?
As discussed under General defences in IPC, which of the following is not recognized as a valid consent under any section IPC?
Which of the following Articles in the Constitution deals with the applicability of habeas corpus?
Which of the following is not subjected to causing of death of person in private defence?