Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India- Curfew – Section 144 CrPC The case primarily dealt with the suspension of the internet in the State of Jammu and Kashmir post revocation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, however, one of the issues in the case was regarding the excessive imposition of Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, which empowers a magistrate to impose restrictions on movement and speech in areas where trouble could erupt. The Supreme Court of India, in this case, held that Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a tool to prevent legitimate expression of opinion. The court further held that Section 144 CrPC is not only remedial but also preventive, and shall be exercised only in cases where there is danger or apprehension of danger. The jurisdiction of Section 144 of CrPC shall not be used to suppress the legitimate expression of opinion or grievance or exercise of any democratic rights
Statements: All pearls are diamonds.
All diamonds are gold
All gold are silvers.
Conclusions: I. All pearls are silvers.
...
Statements:
Some A are B.
Only a few B are C.
All C are D.
Only a few D are E.
Conclusions:
I). No A...
Statements:
Only cats are bats.
No cat is pig.
All pigs are dogs.
All pigs are camels.
Conclus...
Statements: No swan is a penguin.
Some penguins are kingfisher.
Conclusions: I. Some s...
Statements:
Only Short is Big.
No Short is Tallest.
Only a few Tallest is Shortest.
Few Heaviest is Short.
Conclusion...
Statements:
Some imports are exports
No export is credit
Few credits are debit
Conclusions:
I. Some debit are not exp...
Statements:
Only books are staplers.
All pencils are books.
All pencils are glasses.
No glass is a jug.
Conclusion...
Statements:
No Laptop is Computer.
Few Computer is Tablet.
No Tablet is Notebook.
Conclusions:
I. All Tablet being Co...
Statements:
Some Lantern are Light.
Only a few Light are Lamp.
Some Lamp are Torch.
Conclusions:
I. Some T...
