Question
The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari
v. State of UP held thatSolution
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped.  The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
Cartilaginous fish are fish that have a skeleton made of cartilage. Cartilaginous fishes belong to:
Which is not a method of food preservation
Which of the following BGA is not widely distributed in rice growing tracts of India
Mitosis is the process by which a cell replicates its chromosomes and then segregates them, producing two identical nuclei in preparation for cell divi...
Which of the following bacterial genera is a common cause of soft rot in plants?
In a single-action disc harrow, how do the gangs throw the soil?
Sodium deficiency in cow symptom and causes what?
Which of the following states has very little alluvial soil?
Which one is central to soil health?
In agro forestry systems, the tree compete with neighboring crops mainly for:
Relevant for Exams:
