Question
The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari
v. State of UP held thatSolution
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped.  The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
Which film won the Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment at the 70th National Film Awards?
Which of the following gases is used to artificially ripen fruits like bananas and mangoes?
The element used in the manufacture of safety matches is —
Forward contact is a type of derivative which is publically traded
As part of Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav, Indian Railways organized week long celebrations of the ‘Azadi Ki Rail Gadi aur Stations’ from 18th to 2...
Damon Galgut has won the Booker prize 2021 for his novel ____________.
Which state is home to the Keibul Lamjao National Park, known as the only floating national park in the world?
From which language is the term 'Manuscript' derived?
Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), announced that its shareholding in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation (HPCL) has increased to _____Â from 4.901...
Which state government recently banned all kind of synthetic kite string except cotton?