Question
The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari
v. State of UP held thatSolution
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped.  The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
Second hand stocks/shares are traded with: (Common platform for trading)
Amount paid for stationery during 2022-23        ₹ 80,000
Creditors for Stationery on March, 31, 2023       ₹ 7,...
A company wants to list on the Bombay stock exchange. Which of the following processes will result in this?
Amazon and Flipkart are examples of:Â
X Ltd. is merged with Y Ltd. under the pooling of interest method. The reserves and surplus of X Ltd. amount to ₹10 lakhs. How will this be treated in...
Premium income for the year is ₹240 crore, evenly earned. As at year-end, unexpired risk is 50% of premium. Calculate UPR to be carried forward.
What is the interest rate charged on loans given under the PM Vishwakarma Scheme to artisans?
Which of these is a primary objective of financial reporting?
The primary objective of Cash Management is to:
Offering a cash discount to customers for early payment of their invoices will likely: