Question
The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari
v. State of UP held thatSolution
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped.  The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
Who discovered that the potato spindle tuber disease was caused by small naked ssRNA and called it a viroid?
Prevention of food adulteration act was passed in which of the following year?
Which of the following mineral is incorrectly matched with its chemical formula?
ARIS was initiated in the year
Chhatri is a popular variety of_______ fruit crop.
Sunflower is recommended for heart patients as it contains high amount of ____
India is world's _____________ largest producer of fruits and vegetables.
The Modi administration has allocated Rs 450 crore for which among the following?
What is the firing order of a six stroke I.C. engine?
Which two states account for almost 50% of the total agritech start-ups opened in the past 5 years?
Relevant for Exams:
