Question
The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari
v. State of UP held thatSolution
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped.  The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
The flavor of ripened banana is due to which compound
Somatic reproduction is also called:
The Irrigation Commission in India made recommendations in
Chemical generally used for correcting soil acidity is:
Phycobilins are pigments found in which group of organisms?
Rooting of shoot, stems or branches while they are still attached to the parents is called a___.
Which of the following is not a Rabi season crop?
Error degree of freedom for strip plot design
Argemone mexicana adulterates the quality of which of the following?
Which irrigation system has maximum water-use efficiency?