📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

    Question

    The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari

    v. State of UP held that
    A FIR is mandatory in cognizable cases Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Section 53A is mandatory in nature Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Section 172(3) CrPC is constitutionally valid Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Compensation is compulsory in case of custodial deaths Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped.   The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.

    Practice Next
    More Other Laws and Acts Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question