The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari v. State of UP held that
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped. The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
Find the appropriate word.
Fill in the blank with the appropriate word.
Her gratuity and provident fund were settled in 2005. Since , her request for pension was not considered.
1) agreement 2) manageable 3) favorable 4) encouraging 5) forwarded
...Fill in blank 46 with the most appropriate word.
Fill in blank 61 with the most appropriate word.
Choose the most appropriate word to fill the blank (a)
In Argentina in 2014, people first discovered Titanosaurs, ______ are dinosaurs.
5
Select the most appropriate option to fill in blank number 3