Question
The Supreme Court in the landmark case of Lalita Kumari
v. State of UP held thatSolution
Lalita Kumari v. State of UP – FIR mandatory in cognizable cases The writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped. The hon'ble Supreme Court gave various directions- It is mandatory to register an FIR u/s 154 of the Code, if the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. If the information does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether information reveals any cognizable offence.
System of Rice Intensification (SRI) method has been introduced from which country?
Which of the following statements are correct about “Jhum cultivation”
- It is the primitive form of agriculture pract...
Nipping – the removal of apical bud of young plants, is done in which crop?
From the following statements, select the appropriate answer regarding the pre-tarsus in the insect leg?
Conversion factor for conservation of organic carbon to organic matter is usually taken as
Who among the following has the power to appoint Food Safety Officer having prescribed qualifications?
National Dairy Research Institute is at
Free ‐ martin is
The poorest conductor of heat among metals is
In April, 2023, the National Natural Farming Mission was started in Uttarakhand. This Mission aims at improving the soil health, biased use of natural r...