Question
As per the Judgment in case of Keshavananda Bharti
clause (4) of Art. 13 of the constitution in relation to Art. 368 has been______Solution
he 24th amendment to the Indian Constitution was enacted by the then Indira Gandhi government in November 1971. The objective was to nullify the Supreme Court’s ruling that had left the Parliament with no power to curtail the Fundamental Rights. Clause (4) was inserted in Article 13, which states: “Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368.” This provision added more power to the Parliament when it comes to amending the Constitution. It brought Fundamental Rights within the purview of amendment procedure and judicial intervention or review of those amendments was prohibited. This amendment was challenged in the Keshavananda Bharti case and the court upheld it’s validity and also held that parliament has amending power to part III of the constitution subjected to not amending or affecting the basic structure of the constitution.
Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding the objectives of the CDP Suraksha scheme?
1. CDP Suraksha aims to improve exports of ta...
Where is the headquarters of Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) is located?
What exactly is UHT processing used for processing?
Which component of the Vikram 1 launch vehicle was successfully test-fired in March 2024 by Skyroot Aerospace? Â
What term is used to describe a startup company that achieves rapid growth and success?
Which of the following dances comes from southwestern India, around the state of Kerala?Â
Which of the following firm has launched India’s first real estate digital escrow service to facilitate quick, efficient, and secure financial transac...
In which of the following country Chabahar Port located?
"Indian Forest Act" was enacted in the year ______.Â
As per Union budget 2023 - 24 . India is largest _______ and second largest _______ of Shree Anna in the world .