Question
As per the Judgment in case of Keshavananda Bharti
clause (4) of Art. 13 of the constitution in relation to Art. 368 has been______Solution
he 24th amendment to the Indian Constitution was enacted by the then Indira Gandhi government in November 1971. The objective was to nullify the Supreme Court’s ruling that had left the Parliament with no power to curtail the Fundamental Rights. Clause (4) was inserted in Article 13, which states: “Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368.” This provision added more power to the Parliament when it comes to amending the Constitution. It brought Fundamental Rights within the purview of amendment procedure and judicial intervention or review of those amendments was prohibited. This amendment was challenged in the Keshavananda Bharti case and the court upheld it’s validity and also held that parliament has amending power to part III of the constitution subjected to not amending or affecting the basic structure of the constitution.
In a pea flower five petals are arranged in a specialised manner with one posterior, two lateral and two anterior. These are named as and respectively
Scientific name of grape is:Â
Identify the non-selective herbicide.
Average product is equal to marginal product when:Â
Which fruit crop is suitable for arid regions?
Match List I with List II
Choose the correct answ...
How much Stomp 30 EC is required for a 3-hectare area if Pendimethalin is recommended at 0.75 kg/ha to control weeds in groundnut?
Name the vegetative propagation techniques where the plant part to be cut is rooted before it is completely cut away from the parent plant.
A branch and subsidiary are
Which type of utility is created by the processing function in marketing?