New Enroll here to Join NaBFID Analyst Into Class on May 6

    Question

    In the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company it

    was held that_______________
    A The remoteness of Damage Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Intention to create legal relationship Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Advertisement containing certain terms to get a reward is necessary for contract Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D An advertisement containing certain terms to get a reward constituted a binding offer Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    An advertisement containing certain terms to get a reward constituted a binding offer, Explanation: In this it was held that an advertisement containing certain terms to get a reward constituted a binding unilateral offer that could be accepted by anyone who performed its terms.

    Practice Next