Question
In which case it was laid that it is not necessary that
the consideration should move from the promisee himself?Solution
The Court held that it is not necessary that the consideration should move from the promisee himself as laid down under section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which says that ‘Consideration may be given by the promise or anyone on behalf of promisee. Taylor v. Caldwell: The doctrine of impossibility/frustration through destruction of the subject matter was established in this case. NAFED v. Alimenta S.A.: A foreign award was declared as unenforceable on the ground that one of the provisions of the Agreement in question was hit by Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act and thus violative of public policy of India. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd .: Privity of contract- only parties to a contract can sue for a breach of the contract.
Which fertilizer, when applied continuously, can reduce soil pH and lead to chloride toxicity in sensitive crops like potato, grapes, and citrus?
Celphos tablets are used for the management of
The relationship of size of all the features in landscape is
The probability that two genes at any locus in an individual are identical by descent refers to
……………………..organisms that are capable of growth and reproduction in low temperatures, ranging from −20 °C to +10 °C. They are found ...
Increased genetic diversity resulting from extended time in tissue culture is a phenomenon known as:
The breakdown of large food molecules into smaller particles is called
Trickling bed is terminology used in
Which of the following can control of white rust in rapeseed and mustard crops?Â
Jago Grahak Jago Awareness campaign for customers is by which ministry