Question
In which case it was laid that it is not necessary that
the consideration should move from the promisee himself?Solution
The Court held that it is not necessary that the consideration should move from the promisee himself as laid down under section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which says that ‘Consideration may be given by the promise or anyone on behalf of promisee. Taylor v. Caldwell: The doctrine of impossibility/frustration through destruction of the subject matter was established in this case. NAFED v. Alimenta S.A.: A foreign award was declared as unenforceable on the ground that one of the provisions of the Agreement in question was hit by Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act and thus violative of public policy of India. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd .: Privity of contract- only parties to a contract can sue for a breach of the contract.
Where did Shri Narendra Modi inaugurate the foundation stone laying ceremony and unveil the model of Shri Kalki Dham Temple?
In which place ‘Hemis Festival’ is celebrated annually?Â
Which international organization released the list of Global Systemically Important Banks (GSIBs)?
Which city is the headquarters of the North Eastern Railway zone?
The 'e-Kisan Upaj Nidhi' platform simplifies the digital process for farmers, enabling them to store their produce at any registered WDRA warehouse for ...
Which country has made a 21 days quarantine compulsory for the patients of the disease ‘MonkeyPox’ and became the first one to do so?
Which of the following district of Uttar Pradesh situated near the river Sone?
How many women will be selected for the EmpowHER Biz initiative under the WEP of NITI Aayog?
Which country secured the highest funding from the UN's Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) in the latest allocation?
Bandhan Bank has recently opened its first Currency Chest in which state of India?
Relevant for Exams:
