Question
In which case it was laid that it is not necessary that
the consideration should move from the promisee himself?Solution
The Court held that it is not necessary that the consideration should move from the promisee himself as laid down under section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which says that ‘Consideration may be given by the promise or anyone on behalf of promisee. Taylor v. Caldwell: The doctrine of impossibility/frustration through destruction of the subject matter was established in this case. NAFED v. Alimenta S.A.: A foreign award was declared as unenforceable on the ground that one of the provisions of the Agreement in question was hit by Section 32 of the Indian Contract Act and thus violative of public policy of India. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd .: Privity of contract- only parties to a contract can sue for a breach of the contract.
How many members are nominated by the President to the Rajya Sabha?
Who is the present Finance Minister of India?
Vinai Kumar Saxena has been appointed as the lieutenant governor of which union territory?
Which schedule of the Constitution of India contains provisions for disqualification of legislator on the ground of defection?
In a food chain, secondary producers are ______.
In November 2023, Union health ministry has decided that Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres to be renamed as _______.
Pradhan Mantri Swasthya Suraksha Yojana (PMSSY) was launched in the year______.
Kalidas Samman Award has been instituted by which state government?
What is the name of the earliest form of writing known in the Indian subcontinent?Â
How many species of Plasmodium have long been recognised to infect humans in nature to cause malaria?