Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, evaluate the following statements regarding Admissions and Confessions and select the correct option:

Explanation:  This option is based on Section 20 of the BSA (which corresponds to Section 22 of the old Indian Evidence Act). 1. The Rule of Best Evidence The general principle of law is that the Best Evidence must be produced before the Court. In the case of documents, this means the original document (Primary Evidence) must be presented. Spoken words (Oral Evidence) about what is written in a document are considered "hearsay" and are generally inadmissible because the document should "speak for itself." 2. The Exception (When Oral Admissions become Relevant) Oral admissions about the contents of a document only become relevant in two specific scenarios:  ·          Secondary Evidence Qualification: When the party can prove they are entitled to give secondary evidence (like a photocopy or oral account) because the original is lost, destroyed, or in the possession of the opponent who refuses to produce it (conditions now laid out in Section 60 of the BSA, formerly Section 65 IEA). ·          Genuineness in Question: When the very "realness" or authenticity of the document produced is being challenged in Court.