Question

Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS

  • S , 2023, evaluate the procedural validity of a judicial confession recorded under Section 183 in the following scenario: An accused in a murder case is brought before a Magistrate in the district where the FIR was registered. The confession is recorded via audio-video electronic means in the absence of the accused's advocate, despite the accused having legal counsel.
A The confession is fully valid because the presence of an advocate is only mandatory for recording the statements of victims under Section 183(6).
B The confession is procedurally defective because Section 183(1) mandates that any confession or statement recorded by audio-video electronic means must be in the presence of the advocate of the person accused.
C The confession is valid provided the Magistrate has recorded a memorandum at the foot of the record stating that the accused waived their right to an advocate.
D The confession is inadmissible because Section 183 does not permit the use of audio-video electronic means for recording confessions of accused persons; it is reserved for disabled witnesses only.
E The confession is valid only if it is corroborated by a confession made to a police officer under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam.
Practice Next

Relevant for Exams:

Hey! Ask a query