Question
Under Sections 26(1) and (5) of the Payment and
Settlement Systems Act, 2007, Company C commenced payment system operations on January 1, 2025, without RBI authorization (in direct violation of Section 4). The RBI issued a Cease and Desist direction on January 15, 2025, directing Company C to cease operations within 7 days. Company C ignored this direction and continued operating for 60 days (until March 10, 2025, when it finally stopped). Company C had processed ₹100 crores in transactions. Which of the following correctly determines the penalty structure?Solution
Section 26(1) of the PSSA provides: "Where a person contravenes the provisions of section 4 or fails to comply with the terms and conditions subject to which the authorisation has been issued under section 7, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one month but which may extend to ten years or with fine which may extend to one crore rupees or with both and with a further fine which may extend to one lakh rupees for every day, after the first during which the contravention or failure to comply continues." Section 26(5) further provides: "Where a direction issued under this Act is not complied with within the period stipulated by the Reserve Bank or where no such period is stipulated, within a reasonable time or where the penalty imposed by the Reserve Bank under section 30 is not paid within a period of thirty days from the date of the order, the system provider or the system participant which has failed to comply with the direction or to pay the penalty shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one month but which may extend to ten years, or with fine which may extend to one crore rupees or with both and where the failure to comply with the direction continues, with further fine which may extend to one lakh rupees for every day, after the first during which the contravention continues." In Company C's case: (1) Section 26(1) liability attaches from January 1 (commencement without authorization) with continuing violations through March 10 (69 days). Base penalty: 1 month-10 years imprisonment and/or fine up to ₹1 crore. Daily fine: ₹1 lakh × 68 days (excluding first) = ₹68 lakhs. (2) Section 26(5) liability attaches from January 22 (day 8, after the 7-day direction deadline) through March 10 (53 days of non-compliance). Base penalty: 1 month-10 years imprisonment and/or fine up to ₹1 crore. Daily fine: ₹1 lakh × 52 days (excluding first) = ₹52 lakhs. Total exposure: Fine up to ₹2 crores (₹1 crore × 2 provisions) plus ₹120 lakhs in daily penalties, plus potential imprisonment up to 20 years (10 years × 2 provisions). The statute contemplates cumulative penalties for compounded violations. Thus, option (B) correctly applies the dual penalty structure of Sections 26(1) and (5).
The characteristic appearance of damage caused by Eucalyptus gall wasp infestation is?
According to APEDA Act “Special product” means any of the agricultural or processed food products included in the ____ schedule.Â
Conservation hybrid is achieved by which of the following ?
Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority Act came into effect from ____
Inflorescence type present in cashew crop isÂ
Which fruit among the options is affected by the physiological disorder known as Cock's comb?
Which of the following substances is not classified as an insect growth regulator (IGR)?
Molya disease of wheat is caused by _________ nematode.
Photorespiration involves
'Sindhu' variety of mango is a cross of