Question

Under Sections 26(1) and (5) of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, Company C commenced payment system operations on January 1, 2025, without RBI authorization (in direct violation of Section 4). The RBI issued a Cease and Desist direction on January 15, 2025, directing Company C to cease operations within 7 days. Company C ignored this direction and continued operating for 60 days (until March 10, 2025, when it finally stopped). Company C had processed ₹100 crores in transactions. Which of the following correctly determines the penalty structure?

A Company C faces a single penalty of ₹1 crore (maximum for unauthorized operation); continuing operation does not create additional penalties
B Company C faces penalties under Section 26(1) for unauthorized operation (minimum 1 month imprisonment and/or fine up to ₹1 crore plus ₹1 lakh per day for 60 days) AND separately under Section 26(5) for non-compliance with RBI direction (minimum 1 month imprisonment and/or fine up to ₹1 crore plus ₹1 lakh per day for 53 days of non-compliance after the 7-day deadline)
C Company C faces a maximum fine of ₹1 crore total; dual penalties under Sections 26(1) and (5) are not permissible to avoid excessive punishment
D Since Company C eventually ceased operations, penalties are reduced to a warning and nominal fine of ₹10 lakhs
E The transaction amount (₹100 crores) determines the penalty multiplier; Company C's fine is ₹100 crores at a minimum
Practice Next

Relevant for Exams:

Hey! Ask a query