The case of Nallajerla Krishnayya v. Vuppala Raghavulr discusses on the following subject:
In Nallajerla Krishnayya v. Vuppala Raghavulr (A.I.R. 1958 A.P. 658) it has been held that the test for deciding whether the property allotted to a widow or to some other persons for maintenance or for any other purpose comes within the ambit of Section 6(d) or not is whether the deed conferred any right against the properties comprised therein or whether the intention was to give her for her maintenance a personal right to appropriate the profits in the property assigned to her. The answer to this question depends upon the facts of each case and the interpretation of the relevant document
Under Section 2(m) of the Limitation Act, how is "tort" defined?
According to the Insurance Act where the amalgamation or transfer has not been made in accordance with a scheme approved by the Authority under section ...
The Court shall not order a Woman to be detained in Civil prison for execution of decree passed ________
A small company is a company whose paid-up capital and turn over shall________________
All sums realised by way of penalties under the PFRDA Act shall be credited to the______________
A, a police-officer, whose duty it is to prevent robbery, abets the commission of robbery. Here, the robbery is not committed.
The power of court to convert summons- cases into warrant- cases apply to an offence punishable with imprisonment
The President shall cause to be laid the recommendations of the Finance Commission along with the explanatory memorandum before-
Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event does not happen can be enforced__________________
Communication of acceptance is complete:
