Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Amit can sue Bikash for price of goods at either Kolkata where the cause of action arose or at Delhi where Bikash works for gain (carries out business)
Statements: B < C ≥ D > E; F < A ≥ C; Q < F = G
Conclusions:
I. B < A
II. D ≤ F
III. G > E
Statement:
Generally Noida are Meerut.
A few Meerut are Delhi.
All Delhi are Raipur.
No Meerut is Ranchi.
Conclusi...
Statements:
Only a few kites are sticks.
Only a few kites are string.
Conclusions:
1) Some strings being sticks is a possibi...
For a trophy, 16 teams participate, numbered 1-16 according to their rankings. In the qualifier matches, the teams face their immediate next lower ranke...
Statements: S > T ≥ U ≥ V; W < X = V > Y
Conclusions: I. Y > T ...
Statements:
I. All pins are bins.
II. All bins are not papers.
Conclusions:
I. Some papers are pins.
II. ...
Statements: A = B, C ≤ D, E < F, C ≤ F, D > B
Conclusion:
I. B ≥ C
II. B < C
Statements:
Some Dollars are Rupees
All Rupees are Euros
Only Pesos are Rubles
No Ruble is a Euro
Concl...
Statement:
No one is two.
A few two are three.
Only one is four.
Conclusion:
1. All two being three is a possibili...
Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at varian...