Question
Which one of the following is not an essential condition
for application of Rule of "Lis Pendens" under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act?Solution
The suit must be collusive is a negative connotation and cannot be a condition which is legally supported. As per Dotcrine of lis pendens all the options constitute essential conditions except suit must be collusive. · Doctrine of lis pendens is a common law doctrine traces it’s origin to 100 years back. · It was in the case of Bellamy v. Sabine that Turner, L.J., declared that the theory of lis pendens was a doctrine common to both the courts of law and equity, since it would be practically impossible for the action that has been brought in court to be resolved if alienations pendente lite were allowed to proceed. · Applicability in India- ü It is incorporated under s. 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. ü With regard to lis pendens and its application to private affairs, the Supreme Court said in Rajendar Singh v. Santa Singh that the doctrine aims at preventing the court from settling a dispute relating to the property in question and thereby preventing the decision from being implemented.
Three individuals, L, M, and N, invest Rs 28,000, Rs 35,000, and Rs 42,000 respectively in a business. At the end of the year, they earn a profit of Rs ...
P and Q started a business by investing Rs.8000 and Rs.6400 respectively. After 7 months, Q increased his investment by a certain percentage such that a...
- A started a venture with Rs. (P + 1500). After 6 months, B entered with Rs. 2P. If the ratio of B’s profit share to A’s is 6:7, find (P − 500).
A and B started a business with investments in the ratio of 10:11 respectively. If after 2 year, the profit earned by A is Rs. 1880, then find the total...
‘A’ and ‘B’ started a business by investing Rs. (x + 200) and Rs. (x – 800) for 8 months and 7 months, respectively. If the profit share of �...
Anil started a business by investing some money and Mukesh invested Rs. 10000 more than that of Anil. Anil remained in business for 5 months and Mukesh ...
A and B entered into a business investing Rs. (x + 70) and Rs. (x – 40) respectively. After one year they invested Rs. 120 more and Rs. 100 more respe...
A starts business with Rs.11000 and after 8 months, B joins with A as his partner. After a year, the profit divided in the 5:9. What is B’s contribut...
Ms. Neha and Ms. Tara launched a startup with a total investment of Rs. ‘x’. Neha's share in the initial investment was 45%, and Tara invested the r...
- ‘U’ and ‘V’ invested Rs. 8100 and Rs. 5400 respectively for 5 and 9 months. U retained 30% of his profit after donating the rest. He received Rs. 1...