Question
Who among the following cannot be appointed as member of
Securities Appellate Tribunal?Solution
Section 15M of SEBI Act 15M. Qualification for appointment as Presiding Officer, Judicial Member and Technical Member— A person shall not be qualified for appointment as the Presiding Officer or a Judicial Member or a Technical Member of the Securities Appellate Tribunal, unless he— (a) is, or has been, a Judge of the Supreme Court or a Chief Justice of a High Court or a Judge of High Court for at least seven years, in the case of the Presiding Officer; and (b) is, or has been, a Judge of High Court for at least five years, in the case of a Judicial Member; or (c) in the case of a Technical Member–– (i) is, or has been, a Secretary or an Additional Secretary in the Ministry or Department of the Central Government or any equivalent post in the Central Government or a State Government; or (ii) is a person of proven ability, integrity and standing having special knowledge and professional experience, of not less than fifteen years , in financial sector including securities market or pension funds or commodity derivatives or insurance
Section 44 allows the right of private defence against deadly assault with risk of harm to innocent persons to include:
The prohibitory order passed under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall not remain in force for more than ____ from making thereof.Â
What does Section 120 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 deal with?Â
The phase of modernism and post modernism under Jurisprudence emerged during which of the following time periods?
Section 238 deals with errors in the charge. When is an error or omission considered material?Â
How may a conciliator communicate with the parties in a conciliation process?
What are the obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act:Â
Who grants approval under Section 17A of the PC Act?
When the question before the court of law is –
whether a given document is the will of A, Then the state of A’s property and of his family ...
A company claims it implemented adequate procedures to prevent bribery. According to the PC Act, this is: