Question
The Wagan Mound Case
discusses:Solution
In order to calculate the damages remoteness test of directness was replaced with foreseeability in the Wagan Mound case. In this case a large quantity of oil was spilt into Sydney Harbour from the Wagon Mound and it drifted under the wharf where the claimants were oxyacetylene welding. The resulting fire caused extensive damage to the wharf and to vessels moored nearby. The Privy Council replaced the direct consequence test with the requirement that, in order to be recoverable, damage must be foreseeable in all the circumstances, thus, although pollution was a foreseeable consequence of the spillage, an outbreak of fire was not.
Which company recently launched a new AI text-to-3D generator capable of building 3D models for real-world applications?
With reference to the TALASH programme recently launched for Eklavya students, consider the following statements:
1. The programme has been launc...
Which of the following has been identified in the Economic Survey 2023-24 as a key challenge faced by Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in In...
The ‘Sampoornata Abhiyan’ has been launched to achieve 100% saturation of 12 key social sector indicators across all Aspirational Districts and Bloc...
Consider the following statements with respect to the new guidelines issued by BSE for SMEs looking to migrate to main board-
I.According to the ...
When was the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana launched?
Which bank became the first private sector bank to open a branch in Lakshadweep?
What significant event did India's Chandrayaan3 mission achieve?
With reference to NABARD’s Green Lending Facility, consider the following statements:
1. NABARD has set a target of lending ₹10,000 crore in ...
Which scheme aims to improve basic infrastructure and services in 500 cities across India?
Relevant for Exams:
