The Wagan Mound Case discusses:
In order to calculate the damages remoteness test of directness was replaced with foreseeability in the Wagan Mound case. In this case a large quantity of oil was spilt into Sydney Harbour from the Wagon Mound and it drifted under the wharf where the claimants were oxyacetylene welding. The resulting fire caused extensive damage to the wharf and to vessels moored nearby. The Privy Council replaced the direct consequence test with the requirement that, in order to be recoverable, damage must be foreseeable in all the circumstances, thus, although pollution was a foreseeable consequence of the spillage, an outbreak of fire was not.
Match the following:
List I List II
A. First Plan 1. Rapid industrialisation
B. Second Plan &ensp...
Which of the following term is used in banking and finance to describe businesses that have a significant economic impact on the global economy and whos...
Who among the Mughal emperors built Buland Darwaza or the loft gateway at Fatehpur?
A tank can be filled by pipe A in 5 hours and emptied by pipe B in 8 hours respectively. How much time will it take for the tank to be filled?
Who among the following Katyuri rulers was responsible for the construction of the Lakulish Temple in Jageshwar?
Which pair of cities does the Yamuna Expressway connect?
Which of the following dance forms is NOT a classical dance form?
Digital locker and eKYC contribute to the advancement of a paperless work environment and fall within the paperless layer component of which of the foll...
How many products are covered under the Compulsory Registration Scheme (CRS) for parallel testing of select electronics goods, as announced by the Burea...
The Railway Budget was separated from General Budget owing to :