Question
The following Java code attempts to define an abstract
class and use it. Identify the best way to correct the error to allow instantiation of a concrete class. abstract class Vehicle { Â Â abstract void start(); Â Â void stop() { Â Â Â Â System.out.println("Vehicle stopped."); Â Â } } class Car extends Vehicle { Â Â // Missing implementation } public class Main { Â Â public static void main(String[] args) { Â Â Â Â Car myCar = new Car(); Â Â Â Â myCar.start(); Â Â } }Solution
o In Java, if a class (like Vehicle) has an abstract method (start()), then that class itself must be declared abstract. o Any concrete class (a class that can be instantiated, like Car is intended to be) that extends an abstract class must provide an implementation for all inherited abstract methods. o Since Car does not implement start(), it is implicitly abstract and cannot be instantiated. To fix this, Car needs to provide a concrete implementation for the start() method.
Statement: F ≥ G > I > E ≤ P, E = S ≥ PÂ
Conclusion: I. F ≥ P         II. G > P
Statement: Y < Z > I < Q > S = M ≤ N
Conclusions:
I. S= N
II. Q > M
Statements: P = Q = R > S > T > Z; U > R < V < W > X
Conclusions:
I. W > Z
II. R < W
III. R < X
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and ...
Statements: E < F > G; H < I ≤ F; E > D
Conclusions:
I. F > D
II. H < E
III. G < DWhich of the following will be definitely false if the given expression F > G ≥ H > I ≥ J > K = M ≤ N > L ≤ O is definitely true?
Statements: Â M @ N, P @ R, P & N
Conclusions:Â Â Â Â Â a ) M @ PÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â b) R & M
...Statement: F < G; H ≥ I; H ≥ K; I > G ≥ J
Conclusion:
I. G > K
II. K > J
Statements: S = R, T ≤ U, O < J, T ≤ J, U > R
Conclusion:
I. R ≥ T
II. R < T
Statement: D < F; D ≥ E > G; I ≥ H > F
Conclusion:
I. G ≥ F
II. H ≥ D